Hair restoration is a surgical discipline with a long learning curve. Much of the work happens before the first graft is harvested: assessing the donor area, judging how hair loss will progress, and deciding what not to do. A good fellowship teaches that judgement. A weak one teaches a sequence of steps and hands over a certificate.
This guide is for registered doctors comparing programmes. It is a set of questions to ask, not a ranking.
1. Start with your own scope of practice
Before comparing courses, be clear about what your registered qualification allows. In a letter dated 20 September 2022, the National Medical Commission said that hair transplantation should preferably be performed by surgeons with MCh/DNB Plastic Surgery or MD/DNB Dermatology who have adequate surgical training. This guidance is not a ban, but it should shape your plans:
- If you hold a dermatology or plastic-surgery qualification, look for depth: complex cases, revision work, and complication management.
- If you do not, look for a programme that is honest about what you will and will not do hands-on, and that explains how the guidance applies to you.
A programme that promises any doctor "independent practice in a week" is not taking this seriously.
2. Ask how much you will do with your own hands
"Hands-on" covers everything from watching a live case on a screen to performing extractions under supervision. Ask specifically:
- How many trainees are at each patient or station at the same time?
- Which steps will you personally perform: donor marking, extraction, graft sorting, site making, implantation?
- Is there a simulation stage (models or ex-vivo tissue) before work on patients?
- Who is standing next to you during each step, and what are their qualifications?
Get the answers in writing. A clear answer is a good sign, even if the numbers are modest.
3. Check the faculty's qualifications, not their follower counts
Faculty pages should list each surgeon's recognised qualifications, current role and areas of practice. You should be able to check their registration with a State Medical Council or the National Medical Register. Be cautious if a page leads with patient counts, graft totals or "No. 1" claims. Under the NMC's October 2026 advertising guidelines, these are claims doctors should not be making, and an academy that relies on them is showing you how it thinks about compliance.
4. Look at the whole curriculum, not just the headline technique
Extraction technique gets the attention, but outcomes depend on the full chain of work. A complete curriculum should cover:
- Scalp analysis, diagnosis of the cause of hair loss, and when surgery is the wrong answer
- Donor assessment and lifetime donor planning
- Hairline design for the patient's age and pattern of loss
- Local anaesthesia: safe dosing and recognising toxicity
- Graft handling: hydration, out-of-body time and sorting
- Recipient-site creation and implantation methods
- Medical and regenerative therapies that go alongside surgery
- Post-operative care, follow-up and complication management
If a syllabus lists only "FUE, sapphire FUE, DHI", ask what happens in the hours before and after the procedure.
5. Ask what the certificate actually is
Most hair-transplant fellowships in India, ISHA's included, are institute-issued certificates of training. They are not degrees, and they are not qualifications recognised by the NMC. They should not be used as a suffix to your name. A programme that is clear about this from the first conversation is more likely to be clear about everything else.
6. Check how patient consent and safety are handled
Live cases raise ethical questions that a serious programme will answer without being asked:
- Is written, informed consent taken from every patient, including consent for trainee involvement?
- Are procedures done at a registered clinical establishment?
- Who is clinically responsible for each patient, and who follows them up?
- What is the emergency protocol, and is resuscitation equipment on site?
7. Plan for what happens after the course
The first cases you do on your own are when you need advice most. Ask whether faculty are available for case discussion afterwards, whether you can return to observe, and whether there is a clear route from simpler cases to more complex ones.
A short checklist
- Does my qualification fit the hands-on work being offered?
- Do I know exactly which steps I will perform, and under whose supervision?
- Are faculty qualifications and registrations listed and checkable?
- Does the curriculum cover diagnosis, planning and complications, not just technique?
- Is the certificate described honestly?
- Are consent, facility registration and emergency cover clear?
- Is there support after the course?
How ISHA approaches this
ISHA's hair transplant fellowship is a supervised hands-on workshop in Kochi. Faculty qualifications are listed on the faculty page, and the certificate is described as an institute certificate of training. If you are comparing programmes, the track comparison sets out what each track includes, and you can ask us any of the questions above before you apply.
Hair Restoration
Supervised hands-on workshop in Kochi, Kerala
FUE and sapphire FUE, hairline design, graft harvesting and implantation, and regenerative scalp therapies — taught through supervised hands-on sessions in Kochi.
ISHA fellowships are institute-issued certificates of training. They are not degrees or NMC-recognised qualifications and should not be used as a suffix to a doctor's name.